This spring, the FBI investigated CIA Director Petraeus for an affair already ended, because, apparently, an affair by someone in “a highly sensitive post could lead to blackmail and compromise national security.”
This “threat to national security” was so urgent and serious that the FBI did not inform the White House for months, until the day after the election!
If the FBI must investigate the head of the CIA because he holds a “highly sensitive post;” what about the person who holds the most sensitive post of all, our President?
Currently, Obama has concealed involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood in regime change in Egypt, Libya and Syria; concealed arming rebel groups including Al Qaeda groups; and concealed operations in Benghazi which got four of our Americans murdered. He also concealed Iran’s attack on our drone, which could have escalated into a Middle East war.
Shouldn’t a President be required to obtain a basic security clearance? This requires disclosure of personal history including birth and schools records; personal medical history, including use of cocaine and other drugs disclosed in Obama’s book; disclose foreign passports and foreign country residencies and associations; explain his relationships with communists Frank Marshal Davis and Khalid Sheikh Mohamed, relationships with terrorists advocating overthrow of the US government like Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn; and explain regular visits to the White House by the Muslim Brotherhood and other Muslim groups associated with terrorist groups.
Does it make sense for the FBI to investigate Petraeus over an affair and not investigate Obama?
November 10, 2012